IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v40y2002i3p401-424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Democracy through Strong Publics in the European Union?

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Oddvar Eriksen
  • John Erik Fossum

Abstract

This article explores the democratizing role of strong publics, which are institutionalized bodies of deliberation and decision–making. Strong publics are important to modern democracy as they subject decision–making to justificatory debate. This article evaluates selected aspects of the institutional nexus of the EU in order to see if they qualify as strong publics. The focus is on comitology, the European Parliament and the Charter Convention. These bodies vary in their status as strong publics, but to various degrees they all inject the logic of impartial justification and reason–giving into the EU system.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Oddvar Eriksen & John Erik Fossum, 2002. "Democracy through Strong Publics in the European Union?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 401-424, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:40:y:2002:i:3:p:401-424
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00362
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-5965.00362?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stie, Anne Elizabeth, 2010. "Decision-making Void of Democratic Qualities? An Evaluation of the EU’s Second Pillar Decision-making Procedure," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.
    2. Yvonne Galligan & Sara Clavero, 2008. "Researching gender democracy in the European Union: Challenges and prospects," RECON Online Working Papers Series 5, RECON.
    3. Robert Frith, 2008. "Cosmopolitan Democracy and the EU: The Case of Gender," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(1), pages 215-236, March.
    4. Andrew Glencross, 2009. "Altiero Spinelli and the Idea of the US Constitution as a Model for Europe: The Promises and Pitfalls of an Analogy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 287-307, March.
    5. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:46:y:2008:i::p:1001-1023 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Pieter de Wilde, 2009. "Designing Politicization: How control mechanisms in national parliaments affect parliamentary debates in EU policy-formulation," RECON Online Working Papers Series 9, RECON.
    7. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:903-921 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Vivien Schmidt, 2010. "Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited - Input, Output and Throughput," KFG Working Papers p0021, Free University Berlin.
    9. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:287-307 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Fossum, John Erik & Trenz, Hans-Jörg, 2006. "When the people come in: Constitution-making and the belated politicisation of the European Union," European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) 3, CONNEX and EUROGOV networks.
    11. Hugo Canihac & Francesco Laruffa, 2022. "From an Ordoliberal idea to a Social‐Democratic ideal? The European Parliament and the institutionalization of ‘social market economy’ in the European Union (1957‐2007)," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 867-884, July.
    12. Saime Ozcurumez & Julinda Hoxha, 2015. "Conditional Deliberation: The Case of Joint Parliamentary Committees in the EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 642-657, May.
    13. Jürgen Neyer, 2010. "Justice, Not Democracy: Legitimacy in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 903-921, September.
    14. Mair, Peter, 2005. "Popular Democracy and the European Union Polity," European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) 3, CONNEX and EUROGOV networks.
    15. William Dinan, 2021. "Lobbying Transparency: The Limits of EU Monitory Democracy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 237-247.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:40:y:2002:i:3:p:401-424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.