IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v36y1998i3p369-389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EU Media Ownership Regulation: Conflict over the Definition of Alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Alison J. Harcourt

Abstract

The article addresses the politics of agenda‐setting in the European Union (EU) policy process by utilizing the case of media ownership regulation. The author argues that the selection of a ‘frame’ (as defined in Schön and Rein, 1994) for media ownership regulation has been the object of conflict between and within EU institutions, most crucially within the Commission. Conflict, however, has been a resource in the policy process as it has brought in different legitimate interests and perspectives. The article has theoretical implications for the study of agenda‐setting, organizational behaviour in the EU, and the analysis of the EU policy process.

Suggested Citation

  • Alison J. Harcourt, 1998. "EU Media Ownership Regulation: Conflict over the Definition of Alternatives," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 369-389, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:36:y:1998:i:3:p:369-389
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00115
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-5965.00115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miriam Hartlapp & Julia Metz & Christian Rauh, 2010. "The agenda set by the EU Commission: the result of balanced or biased aggregation of positions?," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 21, European Institute, LSE.
    2. Larsen, Tor J. & Olaisen, Johan, 2013. "Innovating strategically in information and knowledge management: Applications of organizational behavior theory," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 764-774.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:36:y:1998:i:3:p:369-389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.