IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v33y1995i2p235-257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

First No, Then Yes: The Danish Referendums on the Maastricht Treaty 1992 and 1993

Author

Listed:
  • TORBEN WORRE

Abstract

This article considers the behaviour of Danish voters in the two referendums on the Treaty on European Union (Maastricht Treaty). The first, in June 1992, rejected the Treaty and threatened the whole union process. The second, in May 1993, approved the Treaty. The development of opinion before and between the referendums is considered, and it is demonstrated that resistance to the Maastricht Treaty was not an effect of opposition to membership of the Community, but the result of a preference for an intergovernmental type of European Co‐operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Torben Worre, 1995. "First No, Then Yes: The Danish Referendums on the Maastricht Treaty 1992 and 1993," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 235-257, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:33:y:1995:i:2:p:235-257
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.1995.tb00529.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1995.tb00529.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1995.tb00529.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iuliana-Lacramioara TINCU, 2017. "Public Support For The European Union In The Current Context: Preliminary Remarks," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 2, pages 155-159, December.
    2. Ece Özlem Atikcan, 2015. "The Puzzle of Double Referendums in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 937-956, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:33:y:1995:i:2:p:235-257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.