IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v52y2025i2p991-1024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Verifiable content in social media stock‐analysis articles: The long and short of it

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Chen
  • Shuping Chen
  • Tian Gao
  • Wuyang Zhao

Abstract

Investment‐related social media platforms are transforming the traditional intermediary landscape by rapidly disseminating user‐empowered opinions and recommendations, raising concerns about the credibility of information on such platforms. We examine the differential content verifiability of SeekingAlpha.com articles with sell recommendations (short articles) versus articles with buy recommendations (long articles). We find that short articles contain greater verifiable content than long articles, and verifiable content in short articles generates greater market reactions and better mitigates return reversals than that in long articles. This asymmetry contrasts prior research evidence that greater content verifiability accompanies traditional sell‐side analyst reports with buy recommendations. Our results are robust to various confounding factors, including author effects, among others. Our results become more pronounced in the presence of greater retail ownership. Taken together, our results provide new evidence on investors’ assessment of the credibility of information on social media platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Chen & Shuping Chen & Tian Gao & Wuyang Zhao, 2025. "Verifiable content in social media stock‐analysis articles: The long and short of it," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 991-1024, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:52:y:2025:i:2:p:991-1024
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12834
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.12834?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:52:y:2025:i:2:p:991-1024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.