IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v52y2025i1p609-651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does options trading affect audit pricing?

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Jahangir Ali
  • Balasingham Balachandran
  • Huu Nhan Duong
  • Premkanth Puwanenthiren
  • Michael Theobald

Abstract

We examine the impact of options trading on audit pricing for a sample of US firms over the period from 2004 to 2021. We find that options trading is significantly and negatively related to audit fees, indicating that firms characterized by higher options trading incur lower audit fees. Auditors spend a lower number of days auditing firms with higher options trading and firms with higher options trading experience lower probabilities of lawsuits, and misstatements, and lower likelihood of material weaknesses and auditor opinion on internal controls. The impact of options trading on audit fees is stronger when the auditor is located further away from the audited firm, for firms with non‐specialized auditors, higher information asymmetry problems, poorer earnings and lower governance quality. Overall, our findings underscore the significance of options trading in improving a firm's information environment and reducing litigation risk, resulting in lower audit fees.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Jahangir Ali & Balasingham Balachandran & Huu Nhan Duong & Premkanth Puwanenthiren & Michael Theobald, 2025. "Does options trading affect audit pricing?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 609-651, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:52:y:2025:i:1:p:609-651
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12821
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.12821?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:52:y:2025:i:1:p:609-651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.