IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v29y2002i1-2p77-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Market Evaluation of Information in Directors’ Trades

Author

Listed:
  • David Hillier
  • Andrew P. Marshall

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the propensity, characteristics and performance of directors’ trades. Consistent with prior research we show that on average, directors outperform the market. However, we also find that there exist a large number of trades which do not share these abnormal share price returns and consequently have little information content. This has important consequences for market participants who use director trading activity as a signal for their own trading strategies. Using different measures of directors’ trades based on trade characteristics, we report that purchases by directors are more informative than sales. In addition, the number of directors trading within a twenty day window and the percentage of the directors’ holding that is being traded are both important factors in the abnormal share price performance following the trade.

Suggested Citation

  • David Hillier & Andrew P. Marshall, 2002. "The Market Evaluation of Information in Directors’ Trades," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1‐2), pages 77-110.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:29:y:2002:i:1-2:p:77-110
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-5957.00424_29_1-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00424_29_1-2
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-5957.00424_29_1-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ryan, Paul, 2005. "The market impact of directors' trades: relationship to various measures of a firm's information environment," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 319-337.
    2. Zhang, Hao & Jin, Tian & Chen, Hanbin, 2023. "Do controlling shareholders collude with their related large shareholders? Evidence of equity pledges and shareholding increases from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Vahidin Jeleskovic & Yinan Wan, 2024. "The impact of Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data scandal on the USA tech stock market: An event study based on clustering method," Papers 2402.14206, arXiv.org.
    4. C. Justin Robinson & Prosper Bangwayo-Skeete, 2017. "Semi-strong Form Market Efficiency in Stock Markets with Low Levels of Trading Activity: Evidence from Stock Price Reaction to Major National and International Events," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(6), pages 1447-1464, December.
    5. André Betzer & Erik Theissen, 2010. "Sooner or Later: An Analysis of the Delays in Insider Trading Reporting," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1‐2), pages 130-147, January.
    6. Irene Karamanou & Grace Pownall & Rachna Prakash, 2021. "Asymmetric information consolidation and price discovery: Inferring bad news from insider sales," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1-2), pages 230-268, January.
    7. Paul Ryan & Richard J. Taffler, 2004. "Are Economically Significant Stock Returns and Trading Volumes Driven by Firm‐specific News Releases?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1‐2), pages 49-82, January.
    8. C. Justin Robinson & Prosper Bangwayo-Skeete, 2017. "Parliamentary Elections and Frontier Stock Markets: Evidence from Stock Market Reaction to General Elections in the Commonwealth Caribbean," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(5), pages 1077-1088, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:29:y:2002:i:1-2:p:77-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.