IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v25y1998i7-8p1025-1032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

US Evidence on Bank Takeover Motives: A Note

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Zhang

Abstract

Existing studies on bank takeovers have not been able to distinguish among the three competing motives: synergy, agency, and hubris. This paper distinguishes the three competing motives by examining the relations between target gains and total gains and between acquirer gains and target gains. Empirical results show that bank takeovers are primarily motivated by synergy, although there is also strong evidence of hubris. Our results also suggest that hubris may explain the positive target gains and zero or negative acquirer gains found in this and many other bank takeover studies. Lastly, evidence exists to suggest that agency, along with hubris, may explain takeovers with negative total gains (JEL G21, G34).

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Zhang, 1998. "US Evidence on Bank Takeover Motives: A Note," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(7‐8), pages 1025-1032, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:25:y:1998:i:7-8:p:1025-1032
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-5957.00224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00224
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-5957.00224?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bozos, Konstantinos & Koutmos, Dimitrios & Song, Wei, 2013. "Beta risk and price synchronicity of bank acquirers’ common stock following merger announcements," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 47-58.
    2. Churyk, Natalie Tatiana, 2005. "Reporting goodwill: are the new accounting standards consistent with market valuations?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(10), pages 1353-1361, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:25:y:1998:i:7-8:p:1025-1032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.