IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v64y2013i1p65-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying a generic function‐based topical relevance typology to structure clinical questions and answers

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoli Huang

Abstract

This study investigates the manifestation and utility of a generic function‐based topical relevance typology adapted to the subject domain of clinical medicine. By specifying the functional role of a given piece of relevant information in the overall structure of a topic, the proposed typology provides a generic framework for integrating different pieces of clinical evidence and a multifaceted view of a clinical problem. In medical problem solving structured knowledge plays a key role. The typology provides the conceptual basis for integrating and structuring knowledge; it incorporates and goes beyond existing clinical schemes (such as PICO and illness script) and offers extra assistance for physicians as well as lay users (such as patients and caregivers) to manage the vast amount of diversified evidence, to maintain a structured view of the patient problem at hand, and ultimately to make well‐grounded clinical choices. Developed as a generic topical framework across topics and domains, the typology proved useful for clinical medicine once extended with domain‐specific definitions and relationships. This article reports the findings of using the adapted and extended typology in the analysis of 26 clinical questions and their evidence‐based answers. The article concludes with potential applications of the typology to improve clinical information seeking, organizing, and processing.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoli Huang, 2013. "Applying a generic function‐based topical relevance typology to structure clinical questions and answers," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 65-85, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:64:y:2013:i:1:p:65-85
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.22808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22808
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.22808?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:64:y:2013:i:1:p:65-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.