IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v64y2013i1p18-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relevance: An improved framework for explicating the notion

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoli Huang
  • Dagobert Soergel

Abstract

Synthesizing and building on many ideas from the literature, this article presents an improved conceptual framework that clarifies the notion of relevance with its many elements, variables, criteria, and situational factors. Relevance is defined as a Relationship (R) between an Information Object (I) and an Information Need (N) (which consists of Topic, User, Problem/Task, and Situation/Context) with focus on R. This defines Relevance‐as‐is (conceptual relevance, strong relevance). To determine relevance, an Agent A (a person or system) operates on a representation I′ of the information object and a representation N′ of the information need, resulting in relevance‐as‐determined (operational measure of relevance, weak relevance, an approximation). Retrieval tests compare relevance‐as‐determined by different agents. This article discusses and compares two major approaches to conceptualizing relevance: the entity‐focused approach (focus on elaborating the entities involved in relevance) and the relationship‐focused approach (focus on explicating the relational nature of relevance). The article argues that because relevance is fundamentally a relational construct the relationship‐focused approach deserves a higher priority and more attention than it has received. The article further elaborates on the elements of the framework with a focus on clarifying several critical issues on the discourse on relevance.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoli Huang & Dagobert Soergel, 2013. "Relevance: An improved framework for explicating the notion," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 18-35, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:64:y:2013:i:1:p:18-35
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.22811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22811
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.22811?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:64:y:2013:i:1:p:18-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.