IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v63y2012i7p1360-1373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of innovation and wealth in the net neutrality debate: A content analysis of human values in congressional and FCC hearings

Author

Listed:
  • An‐Shou Cheng
  • Kenneth R. Fleischmann
  • Ping Wang
  • Emi Ishita
  • Douglas W. Oard

Abstract

Net neutrality is the focus of an important policy debate that is tied to technological innovation, economic development, and information access. We examine the role of human values in shaping the Net neutrality debate through a content analysis of testimonies from U.S. Senate and FCC hearings on Net neutrality. The analysis is based on a coding scheme that we developed based on a pilot study in which we used the Schwartz Value Inventory. We find that the policy debate surrounding Net neutrality revolves primarily around differences in the frequency of expression of the values of innovation and wealth, such that the proponents of Net neutrality more frequently invoke innovation, while the opponents of Net neutrality more frequently invoke wealth in their prepared testimonies. The paper provides a novel approach for examining the Net neutrality debate and sheds light on the connection between information policy and research on human values.

Suggested Citation

  • An‐Shou Cheng & Kenneth R. Fleischmann & Ping Wang & Emi Ishita & Douglas W. Oard, 2012. "The role of innovation and wealth in the net neutrality debate: A content analysis of human values in congressional and FCC hearings," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(7), pages 1360-1373, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:63:y:2012:i:7:p:1360-1373
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.22646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22646
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.22646?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:63:y:2012:i:7:p:1360-1373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.