IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v63y2012i5p889-903.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of classification models for question topic categorization

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Qu
  • Gao Cong
  • Cuiping Li
  • Aixin Sun
  • Hong Chen

Abstract

We study the problem of question topic classification using a very large real‐world Community Question Answering (CQA) dataset from Yahoo! Answers. The dataset comprises 3.9 million questions and these questions are organized into more than 1,000 categories in a hierarchy. To the best knowledge, this is the first systematic evaluation of the performance of different classification methods on question topic classification as well as short texts. Specifically, we empirically evaluate the following in classifying questions into CQA categories: (a) the usefulness of n‐gram features and bag‐of‐word features; (b) the performance of three standard classification algorithms (naive Bayes, maximum entropy, and support vector machines); (c) the performance of the state‐of‐the‐art hierarchical classification algorithms; (d) the effect of training data size on performance; and (e) the effectiveness of the different components of CQA data, including subject, content, asker, and the best answer. The experimental results show what aspects are important for question topic classification in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency. We believe that the experimental findings from this study will be useful in real‐world classification problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Qu & Gao Cong & Cuiping Li & Aixin Sun & Hong Chen, 2012. "An evaluation of classification models for question topic categorization," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(5), pages 889-903, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:63:y:2012:i:5:p:889-903
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.22611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22611
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.22611?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:63:y:2012:i:5:p:889-903. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.