IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v63y2012i5p1054-1058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Editorial responsiveness, journal quality, and total review time: An empirical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zili Zhang
  • Ziqiong Zhang
  • Rob Law

Abstract

This study examined the relationships among perceived editorial responsiveness, perceived journal quality, and review time of submissions for authors in mainland China. Online review data generated by authors who have experienced the submission process in 10 Chinese academic journals were collected. The results of Spearman correlation analysis show that Chinese authors' perceived responsiveness of an editorial office is positively correlated with perceived quality of the journal, and the total review time does not affect perceptions of the quality of a journal and its editorial responsiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Zili Zhang & Ziqiong Zhang & Rob Law, 2012. "Editorial responsiveness, journal quality, and total review time: An empirical analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(5), pages 1054-1058, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:63:y:2012:i:5:p:1054-1058
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.22624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22624
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.22624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:63:y:2012:i:5:p:1054-1058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.