IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v60y2009i9p1836-1844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of text‐classification techniques applied to Arabic text

Author

Listed:
  • Ghassan Kanaan
  • Riyad Al‐Shalabi
  • Sameh Ghwanmeh
  • Hamda Al‐Ma'adeed

Abstract

Many algorithms have been implemented for the problem of text classification. Most of the work in this area was carried out for English text. Very little research has been carried out on Arabic text. The nature of Arabic text is different than that of English text, and preprocessing of Arabic text is more challenging. This paper presents an implementation of three automatic text‐classification techniques for Arabic text. A corpus of 1445 Arabic text documents belonging to nine categories has been automatically classified using the kNN, Rocchio, and naïve Bayes algorithms. The research results reveal that Naïve Bayes was the best performer, followed by kNN and Rocchio.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghassan Kanaan & Riyad Al‐Shalabi & Sameh Ghwanmeh & Hamda Al‐Ma'adeed, 2009. "A comparison of text‐classification techniques applied to Arabic text," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(9), pages 1836-1844, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:60:y:2009:i:9:p:1836-1844
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.20832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20832
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.20832?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:60:y:2009:i:9:p:1836-1844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.