IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v60y2009i11p2347-2352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feature reduction techniques for Arabic text categorization

Author

Listed:
  • Rehab Duwairi
  • Mohammad Nayef Al‐Refai
  • Natheer Khasawneh

Abstract

This paper presents and compares three feature reduction techniques that were applied to Arabic text. The techniques include stemming, light stemming, and word clusters. The effects of the aforementioned techniques were studied and analyzed on the K‐nearest‐neighbor classifier. Stemming reduces words to their stems. Light stemming, by comparison, removes common affixes from words without reducing them to their stems. Word clusters group synonymous words into clusters and each cluster is represented by a single word. The purpose of employing the previous methods is to reduce the size of document vectors without affecting the accuracy of the classifiers. The comparison metric includes size of document vectors, classification time, and accuracy (in terms of precision and recall). Several experiments were carried out using four different representations of the same corpus: the first version uses stem‐vectors, the second uses light stem‐vectors, the third uses word clusters, and the fourth uses the original words (without any transformation) as representatives of documents. The corpus consists of 15,000 documents that fall into three categories: sports, economics, and politics. In terms of vector sizes and classification time, the stemmed vectors consumed the smallest size and the least time necessary to classify a testing dataset that consists of 6,000 documents. The light stemmed vectors superseded the other three representations in terms of classification accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Rehab Duwairi & Mohammad Nayef Al‐Refai & Natheer Khasawneh, 2009. "Feature reduction techniques for Arabic text categorization," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(11), pages 2347-2352, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:60:y:2009:i:11:p:2347-2352
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.21173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21173
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.21173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammed Rushdi‐Saleh & M. Teresa Martín‐Valdivia & L. Alfonso Ureña‐López & José M. Perea‐Ortega, 2011. "OCA: Opinion corpus for Arabic," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 2045-2054, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:60:y:2009:i:11:p:2347-2352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.