IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v58y2007i14p2255-2268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information systems project post‐mortems: Insights from an attribution perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Gary Pan
  • Shan L Pan
  • Michael Newman

Abstract

Information systems (IS) project failure is a costly and common problem. This is despite advances in development tools and technologies. In this article, we argue that one reason for this is the failure of project post‐mortems to generate constructive “lessons learned” from previous projects. Over time, the ineffective practices would persist in the organization, rendering it resistant to change. The attribution theory literature serves as one of the few promising theoretical bases to explain why project post‐mortems fail. A case study of a project post‐mortem undertaken for an abandoned electronic procurement system project is discussed and analyzed. We identify five antecedent conditions of attribution error: the presence of self‐appointed mindsets, the general persistence of negative beliefs, memory decay, selective recall of project events and the influence of power dynamics within the organization. We discuss the research and practical implications of these findings and suggest how the problem of attribution error may be minimized in project post‐mortems.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary Pan & Shan L Pan & Michael Newman, 2007. "Information systems project post‐mortems: Insights from an attribution perspective," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(14), pages 2255-2268, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:58:y:2007:i:14:p:2255-2268
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.20693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20693
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.20693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:58:y:2007:i:14:p:2255-2268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.