IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v54y2003i3p243-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stereotype‐based versus personal‐based filtering rules in information filtering systems

Author

Listed:
  • Tsvi Kuflik
  • Bracha Shapira
  • Peretz Shoval

Abstract

Rule‐based information filtering systems maintain user profiles where the profile consists of a set of filtering rules expressing the user's information filtering policy. Filtering rules may refer to various attributes of the data items subject to the filtering process. In personal rule‐based filtering systems, each user has his/her own personal filtering rules. In stereotype rule‐based filtering systems, a user is assigned to a group of similar users (his/her stereotype) from which he/she inherits the stereotype's filtering profile. This study compares the effectiveness of the two alternative rule‐based filtering methods: stereotype‐based rules versus personal rules. We conducted a comparison between filtering effectiveness when using the personal rules or when using the stereotype‐based rules. Although, intuitively, personal filtering rules seem to be more effective because each user has his own tailored rules, our comparative study reveals that stereotype filtering rules yield more effective results. We believe that this is because users find it difficult to evaluate their filtering preferences accurately. The results imply that by using a stereotype it is possible not only to overcome the problem of user effort required to generate a manual rule‐based profile, but at the same time even provide a better initial user profile.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsvi Kuflik & Bracha Shapira & Peretz Shoval, 2003. "Stereotype‐based versus personal‐based filtering rules in information filtering systems," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 54(3), pages 243-250, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:54:y:2003:i:3:p:243-250
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.10220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10220
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.10220?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:54:y:2003:i:3:p:243-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.