IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v54y2003i2p124-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating how individuals conceptually and physically structure file folders for electronic bookmarks: The example of the financial services industry

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Gottlieb
  • Juris Dilevko

Abstract

Personal preferences in the development of categorical folders for bookmarks are examined in terms of both the choice and definition of folder domain and the overall structure of the folder system. Study participants from the financial industry were asked to organize the same set of finance‐related bookmarks from a given list, as opposed to describing their organizational approaches using their own personal bookmarks, so that the organizational systems could be compared across the sample. The selection of folder domain is influenced by contextual factors such as intended use and relevancy to current projects. Similarly, the structure of the overall folder system was determined in part by participants' navigational preferences. While the majority of participants created folders that cover the topics of finance, government, accounting, news, law, and tax, the actual definition of these folders and the criteria for inclusion vary across the sample. Furthermore, these criteria cannot be readily discerned from the folder system itself. Variation in folder domain and definition could adversely affect the utility of bookmark management systems for multiple users that involve some degree of standardization. The same variation in interpretation of seemingly identical folders suggests that systems with automatic categorization would not provide users with enough flexibility in how they could organize and access their bookmarks.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Gottlieb & Juris Dilevko, 2003. "Investigating how individuals conceptually and physically structure file folders for electronic bookmarks: The example of the financial services industry," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 54(2), pages 124-139, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:54:y:2003:i:2:p:124-139
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.10174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10174
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.10174?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:54:y:2003:i:2:p:124-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.