IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v54y2003i12p1117-1133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intermediary's information seeking, inquiring minds, and elicitation styles

Author

Listed:
  • Mei‐Mei Wu
  • Ying‐Hsang Liu

Abstract

The current research explores how intermediaries seek information from patrons, in particular by analyzing intermediaries' elicitation utterances through three dimensions—linguistic forms, utterance purposes, and communicative functions—to determine whether indeed any dimension appeared consistently, to be called “elicitation styles.” Five intermediaries from four academic libraries (three national university libraries, one private university library) and one research institute library participated in the study. Thirty patrons with 30 genuine search requests were recruited; thus, 30 patron/intermediary information retrieval interactions making a total of 30 encounters were collected. Video/audio data were taped. Dialogues between patron and intermediary were transcribed. Statistical analysis revealed three types of elicitation styles among the five intermediaries, labeled, (1) situationally oriented, (2) functionally oriented, and (3) stereotyped. This study seeks an explanation for different elicitation styles. Qualitative analysis was applied to investigate “inquiring minds.” An inquiring mind is termed to represent a mentality or tendency that one elicits certain threads of questions influenced by professional beliefs, individual characteristics, tasks, goals, and interactional contexts in conversation. The results of qualitative analysis specified three modes of inquiring minds of the intermediaries, namely: (1) information problem detection, (2) query formulation process, and (3) database instructions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mei‐Mei Wu & Ying‐Hsang Liu, 2003. "Intermediary's information seeking, inquiring minds, and elicitation styles," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 54(12), pages 1117-1133, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:54:y:2003:i:12:p:1117-1133
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.10323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10323
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.10323?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Bodoff & Daphne Raban, 2012. "User models as revealed in web-based research services," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(3), pages 584-599, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:54:y:2003:i:12:p:1117-1133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.