IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v51y2000i8p745-756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Abstracts produced using computer assistance

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy C. Craven

Abstract

Experimental subjects wrote abstracts of articles using a simplified version of the TEXNET abstracting assistance software. In addition to the full text, subjects were presented with either keywords or phrases extracted automatically. The resulting abstracts, and the times taken, were recorded automatically; some additional information was gathered by oral questionnaire. Selected abstracts produced were evaluated on various criteria by independent raters. Results showed considerable variation among subjects, but 37% found the keywords or phrases “quite” or “very” useful in writing their abstracts. Statistical analysis failed to support several hypothesized relations: phrases were not viewed as significantly more helpful than keywords; and abstracting experience did not correlate with originality of wording, approximation of the author abstract, or greater conciseness. Requiring further study are some unanticipated strong correlations including the following: Windows experience and writing an abstract like the author's; experience reading abstracts and thinking one had written a good abstract; gender and abstract length; gender and use of words and phrases from the original text. Results have also suggested possible modifications to the TEXNET software.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy C. Craven, 2000. "Abstracts produced using computer assistance," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 51(8), pages 745-756.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:51:y:2000:i:8:p:745-756
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:83.0.CO;2-Z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:83.0.CO;2-Z
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:83.0.CO;2-Z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:51:y:2000:i:8:p:745-756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.