IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v51y2000i10p929-939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Users' perception of relevance of spoken documents

Author

Listed:
  • Tassos Tombros
  • Fabio Crestani

Abstract

We present the results of a study of user's perception of relevance of documents. The aim is to study experimentally how users' perception varies depending on the form that retrieved documents are presented. Documents retrieved in response to a query are presented to users in a variety of ways, from full text to a machine spoken query‐biased automatically‐generated summary, and the difference in users' perception of relevance is studied. The experimental results suggest that the effectiveness of advanced multimedia Information Retrieval applications may be affected by the low level of users' perception of relevance of retrieved documents.

Suggested Citation

  • Tassos Tombros & Fabio Crestani, 2000. "Users' perception of relevance of spoken documents," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 51(10), pages 929-939.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:51:y:2000:i:10:p:929-939
    DOI: 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)51:103.0.CO;2-D
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)51:103.0.CO;2-D
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)51:103.0.CO;2-D?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:51:y:2000:i:10:p:929-939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.