IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v49y1998i5p423-434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feature selection and effective classifiers

Author

Listed:
  • Jitender S. Deogun
  • Suresh K. Choubey
  • Vijay V. Raghavan
  • Hayri Sever

Abstract

In this article, we develop and analyze four algorithms for feature selection in the context of rough set methodology. The initial state and the feasibility criterion of all these algorithms are the same. That is, they start with a given feature set and progressively remove features, while controlling the amount of degradation in classification quality. These algorithms, however, differ in the heuristics used for pruning the search space of features. Our experimental results confirm the expected relationship between the time complexity of these algorithms and the classification accuracy of the resulting upper classifiers. Our experiments demonstrate that a θ‐reduct of a given feature set can be found efficiently. Although we have adopted upper classifiers in our investigations, the algorithms presented can, however, be used with any method of deriving a classifier, where the quality of classification is a monotonically decreasing function of the size of the feature set. We compare the performance of upper classifiers with those of lower classifiers. We find that upper classifiers perform better than lower classifiers for a duodenal ulcer data set. This should be generally true when there is a small number of elements in the boundary region. An upper classifier has some important features that make it suitable for data mining applications. In particular, we have shown that the upper classifiers can be summarized at a desired level of abstraction by using extended decision tables. We also point out that an upper classifier results in an inconsistent decision algorithm, which can be interpreted deterministically or non‐deterministically to obtain a consistent decision algorithm. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Jitender S. Deogun & Suresh K. Choubey & Vijay V. Raghavan & Hayri Sever, 1998. "Feature selection and effective classifiers," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 49(5), pages 423-434.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:49:y:1998:i:5:p:423-434
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980415)49:53.0.CO;2-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980415)49:53.0.CO;2-0
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980415)49:53.0.CO;2-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. G. Levitin, 2003. "Threshold optimization for weighted voting classifiers," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(4), pages 322-344, June.
    2. Levitin, Gregory, 2002. "Evaluating correct classification probability for weighted voting classifiers with plurality voting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 596-607, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:49:y:1998:i:5:p:423-434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.