IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v47y1996i8p588-602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correspondence factor analysis of the publication patterns of 48 countries over the period 1981–1992

Author

Listed:
  • Jean‐Christophe Doré
  • Tiiu Ojasoo
  • Yoshiko Okubo
  • Thomas Durand
  • Gérard Dudognon
  • Jean‐François Miquel

Abstract

This study illustrates the application of a descriptive multivariate statistical method, Correspondence Factorial Analysis (CFA), to the analysis of a dataset of over 6 million bibliometric entries (data from ISI). CFA is used to show how the 48 most prolific nations stand in relation to each with regard to their publication interests in 17 specific disciplinary areas and one multidisciplinary field over the period 1981–1992. The output of a CFA is a map displaying proximity among variables (countries and disciplines) and constitutes an impartial working document for experts interested in the evaluation of science. The present study focuses on three aspects of a CFA: (1) The normalized “publication patterns” of countries with a common feature (e.g., that belong to the same geopolitical zone, economic union, etc.) can be pooled in order to highlight the position of the union with respect to individual countries; (2) complex CFA maps can be simplified by selecting reference countries or disciplines and observing how the remaining countries and disciplines relate to these references; (3) data on additional countries (new publication profiles) or on additional variables (e.g., socio‐economic data on all the countries under study) can be introduced into the CFA maps used as mathematical models. Our CFA of the ISI dataset reveals the scientific interests of nations in relative terms. The main cleavage (the first factorial axis) is between countries that still concentrate on the disciplines of the industrial revolution such as physics and chemistry (or that have turned toward their offspring, materials sciences) and those that have veered toward more “modern” disciplines such as the life sciences (e.g., clinical medicine), the environment, and computer sciences. The second cleavage, along the second factorial axis, is between countries that focus on the agricultural sciences (the land surface) and those interested in the geosciences (the sea, earth's mantle, and mining). The third and fourth axes discriminate even further between earth, life, and abstract sciences highlighting the ostensible relationship between (organic) chemistry and all life science disciplines and between physics and disciplines related to engineering, materials sciences, etc. The CFA maps disclose the specific behavior of each country with respect to these cleavages. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean‐Christophe Doré & Tiiu Ojasoo & Yoshiko Okubo & Thomas Durand & Gérard Dudognon & Jean‐François Miquel, 1996. "Correspondence factor analysis of the publication patterns of 48 countries over the period 1981–1992," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 47(8), pages 588-602, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:47:y:1996:i:8:p:588-602
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199608)47:83.0.CO;2-P
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199608)47:83.0.CO;2-P
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199608)47:83.0.CO;2-P?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jean-Christophe Doré & Christian Dutheuil & Jean-François Miquel, 2000. "Multidimensional Analysis of Trends in Patent Activity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 47(3), pages 475-492, March.
    2. A. J. Nederhof & E. Wijk, 1999. "Profiling institutes: Identifying high research performance and social relevance in the social and behavioral sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 44(3), pages 487-506, March.
    3. T. Ojasoo & J. C. Doré, 1999. "Citation bias in medical journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 45(1), pages 81-94, May.
    4. K. T. Anuradha & Shalini R. Urs, 2007. "Bibliometric indicators of Indian research collaboration patterns: A correspondence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(2), pages 179-189, May.
    5. Mickael Benaim & Jean-Alain Héraud & Valérie Mérindol, 2016. "Scientific connectivity of European regions: towards a typology of cooperative schemes," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 155-176.
    6. Richard Klavans & Kevin W Boyack, 2017. "The Research Focus of Nations: Economic vs. Altruistic Motivations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, January.
    7. Ali Gazni & Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Fereshteh Didegah, 2012. "Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(2), pages 323-335, February.
    8. Chen, Kaihua & Zhang, Yi & Fu, Xiaolan, 2019. "International research collaboration: An emerging domain of innovation studies?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 149-168.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:47:y:1996:i:8:p:588-602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.