IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v47y1996i1p1-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some perspectives on the evaluation of information retrieval systems

Author

Listed:
  • Jean M. Tague‐Sutcliffe

Abstract

As an introduction to the papers in this special issue, some of the major problems facing investigators evaluating information retrieval systems are presented. These problems include the question of the necessity of using real users, as opposed to subject experts, in making relevance judgements, the possibility of evaluating individual components of the retrieval process, rather than the process as a whole, the kinds of aggregation that are appropriate for the measures used in evaluating information retrieval systems, the value of an analytic or simulatory, as opposed to an experimental, approach in evaluating retrieval systems, the difficulties in evaluating interactive systems, and the kinds of generalization which are possible from information retrieval tests. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean M. Tague‐Sutcliffe, 1996. "Some perspectives on the evaluation of information retrieval systems," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 47(1), pages 1-3, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:47:y:1996:i:1:p:1-3
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199601)47:13.0.CO;2-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199601)47:13.0.CO;2-3
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199601)47:13.0.CO;2-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:47:y:1996:i:1:p:1-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.