IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v47y1996i12p932-940.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The modern language association: Electronic and paper surveys of computer‐based tool use

Author

Listed:
  • Debora Shaw
  • Charles H. Davis

Abstract

Members of the Modern Language Association of America (MLA) were surveyed about their use of computer‐based tools. A questionnaire was sent to 1,000 randomly‐selected members in the U.S., with 500 sent via paper mail and 500 through electronic mail. Word processing, electronic mail, on‐line catalogs, and the MLA International Bibliography were used heavily. Responses by the two subgroups differed significantly in several respects. Electronic full texts received substantially less use by both groups, especially those responding to the print survey. Major changes in research habits included greater reliance on word processing and more work outside of libraries. Problems reported focused on access to computer‐based resources, learning to use them, the need for instruction, and inconsistent interfaces. Finally, evidence strongly suggests that reliance solely on electronic surveys may produce misleading results. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Debora Shaw & Charles H. Davis, 1996. "The modern language association: Electronic and paper surveys of computer‐based tool use," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 47(12), pages 932-940, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:47:y:1996:i:12:p:932-940
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199612)47:123.0.CO;2-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199612)47:123.0.CO;2-3
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199612)47:123.0.CO;2-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:47:y:1996:i:12:p:932-940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.