IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v44y1993i3p175-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The validity of Poisson assumptions in a combined loglinear/MDS mapping model

Author

Listed:
  • James E. Everett

Abstract

The validity of assuming a Poisson loglinear model as the generating process for citations from one journal into another has been questioned on the grounds that the expected citation rate may fluctuate, and that the citations may not be independent events. These objections are discussed. It is shown that fluctuation in generating rate is not a problem because the number of events generated by a Poisson process of fluctuating rate has the same probability distribution as for a Poisson process of the average rate sustained over the same period. It is also shown that nonindependence of citations would create no systematic bias, although it could lower the estimation efficiency by overweighting nonindependent citation patterns. There is no possibility of distinguishing variation in Poisson rate from nonindependence of citations because every citation series is a single sample from a unique process and can be equally well explained by either assumption. Accordingly, parsimony supports the choice of the Poisson model. Citation data are analyzed to confirm that the Poisson rate does vary with time. Nontransitivity is considered as another possible objection to the Poisson loglinear citation mapping model, and is shown not to be a major problem in the data set analyzed. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • James E. Everett, 1993. "The validity of Poisson assumptions in a combined loglinear/MDS mapping model," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 44(3), pages 175-178, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:44:y:1993:i:3:p:175-178
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199304)44:33.0.CO;2-T
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199304)44:33.0.CO;2-T
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199304)44:33.0.CO;2-T?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:44:y:1993:i:3:p:175-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.