IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v42y1991i1p27-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deriving disciplinary structures: Some new methods, models, and an illustration with accounting

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Bricker

Abstract

This study demonstrates the use of two microcomputer based extensions of cocitation clustering, and content analysis to derive a disciplinary structure. The use of an independent data source and multiple discriminant analysis as a validation tool is also demonstrated. One extension of cocitation clustering is a form of non‐hierarchical single‐link clustering, and the second is sequential cocitation threshold stepping. These extensions can be used to cluster cocitations and syntactically represent cluster structure in the form of a dendogram. This structure can be given semantic content through the use of content analysis. The Research Markets Model of the behavior of research scholars provides a framework within which the heterogeneity and homogeneity apparent in the structure of scholarly disciplines is interpreted. © 1991 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Bricker, 1991. "Deriving disciplinary structures: Some new methods, models, and an illustration with accounting," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 42(1), pages 27-35, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:42:y:1991:i:1:p:27-35
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199101)42:13.0.CO;2-B
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199101)42:13.0.CO;2-B
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199101)42:13.0.CO;2-B?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lowe, Alan & Locke, Joanne, 2006. "Constructing an ‘efficient frontier’ of accounting journal quality," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 321-341.
    2. Özgür Özmen Uysal, 2010. "Business Ethics Research with an Accounting Focus: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1988 to 2007," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 137-160, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:42:y:1991:i:1:p:27-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.