IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v38y1987i4p245-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Boolean interpretation of conjunctions for document retrieval

Author

Listed:
  • Padmini Das‐Gupta

Abstract

It is generally recognized that the conjunction “and” plays an ambiguous role in natural language. When considered within the domain of Boolean document retrieval, this ambiguity makes the automatic Boolean interpretation of statements representing information needs a difficult task. The human analyst is able to resolve this ambiguity with relative ease. However, the processes employed appear complex and are not well understood. This article examines a semantic property of the conjunction, i.e., the semantic similarity between the conjuncts with a view to automatically resolving this ambiguity. Specifically, the idea examined is that if the two conjuncts are semantically similar then the conjunction is best interpreted as a Boolean OR, otherwise as an AND. The study resulted in an algorithm which utilizes semantic information and some syntactic information (both of which are derivable from a standard dictionary) to obtain the appropriate Boolean interpretation. The algorithm was successful when evaluated against human decisions. In addition to contributing the algorithm, this article draws attention to the effects of this ambiguity on the derivation of appropriate Boolean search specifications from natural‐language statements representing information needs. © 1987 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Padmini Das‐Gupta, 1987. "Boolean interpretation of conjunctions for document retrieval," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 38(4), pages 245-254, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:38:y:1987:i:4:p:245-254
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198707)38:43.0.CO;2-E
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198707)38:43.0.CO;2-E
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198707)38:43.0.CO;2-E?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:38:y:1987:i:4:p:245-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.