IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v32y1981i3p217-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The management and social science literatures: An interdisciplinary cross‐citation analysis

Author

Listed:
  • James D. Neeley

Abstract

A method is proposed for measuring interdisciplinary relations in scientific literature based on cross citation among core journals empirically selected on the basis of use and importance. The method is used to test hypotheses derived from a bibliometric definition of interdisciplinarity among the management and social science literatures. The results reveal that the management literature is dependent on the social sciences, that it is more dependent on them than vice versa, and that it is more dependent on them than they are on each other.

Suggested Citation

  • James D. Neeley, 1981. "The management and social science literatures: An interdisciplinary cross‐citation analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 32(3), pages 217-223, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:32:y:1981:i:3:p:217-223
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630320308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320308
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.4630320308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Carlos Alicea Rivera, 2011. "Communities Of Practice And Knowledge Management: A Descriptive Study, Las Comunidades De Practica Y La Gestion Del Conocimiento: Un Estudio Descriptivo," Revista Internacional Administracion & Finanzas, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 4(1), pages 83-100.
    2. Juan Carlos Alicea Rivera, 2011. "Communities Of Practice: Improving Knowledge Management In Business," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 3(1), pages 101-111.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:32:y:1981:i:3:p:217-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.