IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v29y1978i5p238-246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical examination of Bradford's law and the scattering of scientific literature

Author

Listed:
  • M. Carl Drott
  • Belver C. Griffith

Abstract

Twenty‐three data sets representing the documents retrieved by a wide variety of searches were examined for correspondence to Bradford's Law. Regression lines fit to the data sets showed all correlations in excess of 0.96. Thus, the fitted line, as customarily specified by slope and intercept, can serve as a good representation of an entire data set. Slope can be shown to be almost entirely determined by the total number of articles retrieved. Over two‐thirds of the variance in the intercept is accounted for by the total number of journal titles retrieved. These findings weigh against earlier speculation that slope and intercept depended on such characteristics as breadth of subject area, topic, time period, or search technique. The findings show that Bradford's Law is the reflection of some underlying process not related to the characteristics of the search mechanism or the nature of the literature. The authors conclude that there is instead a basic probabilistic mechanism underlying the law.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Carl Drott & Belver C. Griffith, 1978. "An empirical examination of Bradford's law and the scattering of scientific literature," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 29(5), pages 238-246, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:29:y:1978:i:5:p:238-246
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630290506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630290506
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.4630290506?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zahed Bigdeli & Ali Gazni, 2012. "Authors’ sources of information: a new dimension in information scattering," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(3), pages 505-521, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:29:y:1978:i:5:p:238-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.