IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v29y1978i2p77-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A threshold rule applied to the retrieval decision model

Author

Listed:
  • Donald H. Kraft

Abstract

The retrieval decision problem is considered from the viewpoint of a decision theory approach. A threshold rule based on a suggested rule for indexing is considered and analyzed for retrieval decisions. The threshold rule is seen as a good descriptive measure of what a reasonable retrieval system should be able to accomplish. A retrieval mechanism of randomly drawing documents is analyzed to determine the relative strength of the threshold rule. The Neyman‐Pearson lemma is shown to yield a better a priori decision rule for retrieval; maximize precision subject to a fixed level of recall, instead of setting a lower limit upon precision, as does the threshold rule. The threshold rule is seen as a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for effective retrieval. A sufficient condition for the threshold rule illustrates the relationship between it and the rule derived from the Neyman‐Pearson lemma. Finally, a new measure of information retrieval system performance is presented, based on the threshold rule.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald H. Kraft, 1978. "A threshold rule applied to the retrieval decision model," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 29(2), pages 77-80, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:29:y:1978:i:2:p:77-80
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630290206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630290206
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.4630290206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:29:y:1978:i:2:p:77-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.