Author
Abstract
The National Clearinghouse for Alcohol Information (NCALI) is an information resource developed by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism of the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. It provides numerous information services to professionals in a wide spectrum of alcohol‐related disciplines and to the general public. These services are designed to aid in the identification and dissemination of literature in the alcoholism field. One such service is provision of a quality evaluation rating for the documents announced by the Clearinghouse. The Quality Evaluation of Literature System (QELS) is designed to select and discriminate among literature in the field on the basis of quality criteria developed by alcoholism field professionals and to announce the resulting comparative ratings to literature users. In this way, QELS aids literature users in determining those documents of highest potential value to them. QELS is by no means a censorship system. The Clearinghouse makes available a wide spectrum of alcoholrelated information, including items which do not qualify for the QELS program as well as both high and low rated information items. The mechanics of the system include initial document ratings by highly regarded professionals who are peers of the authors, the conversion of these “raw” ratings into standardized scores for comparability, the announcement of these scores through the many information services of the Clearinghouse, and the encouragement of user feedback ratings which are factored into the document scores on a regular review and update cycle. Evaluation of the techniques employed in the QELS program and of its overall effectiveness is being carried out on a continuing basis. The program holds promise for providing a valuable service to users in any disciplineor issue‐oriented information field.
Suggested Citation
Morris E. Chafetz, 1976.
"Toward increased quality consciousness for alcoholism literature,"
Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 27(3), pages 162-170, May.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:jamest:v:27:y:1976:i:3:p:162-170
DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630270305
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:27:y:1976:i:3:p:162-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.