IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v25y1974i3p145-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opinion paper. an affirmative statement on copyright debate

Author

Listed:
  • Johanna E. Tallman

Abstract

The roles of the government, author, publisher, library, user, public, and foreign countries are linked to the basic issue of the resolution as well as to the broader implications of the copyright problem. The major contention is that, since the government supports research and publication for the benefit of the public, this information should be disseminated at a minimum cost with maximum accessibility, at no extra profit to the publisher. Fiscal implications relate higher costs of publications to library budgetary limitations as basic reasons for subscription cuts. Data and citations from various sources are used to support the arguments for the affirmative of the resolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Johanna E. Tallman, 1974. "Opinion paper. an affirmative statement on copyright debate," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 25(3), pages 145-150, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:25:y:1974:i:3:p:145-150
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630250304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630250304
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.4630250304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:25:y:1974:i:3:p:145-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.