Author
Abstract
Some new text searching retrieval techniques are described which retrieve not documents but sentences from documents and sometimes (on occasions determined by the computer) multi‐sentence sequences. Since the goal of the techniques is retrieval of answer‐providing documents, “answer‐passages” are retrieved. An “answer‐passage” is a passage which is either answer‐providing or “answer‐indicative,” i.e., it permits inferring that the document containing it is answer‐provding. In most cases answer‐sentences, i.e., single‐sentence answer‐passages, are retrieved. This has great advantages for screening retrieval output. Two new automatic procedures for measuring closeness of relation between clue words in a sentence are described. One approximates syntactic closeness by counting the number of intervening “syntactic joints” (roughly speaking, prepositions, conjunctions and punctuation marks) between successive clue words. The other measure uses word proximity in a new way. The two measures perform about equally well. The computer uses “enclosure” and “connector words” for determining when a multi‐sentence passage should be retrieved. However, no procedure was found in this study for retrieving multi‐paragraph answer‐passages, which were the only answer‐passages occurring in 6% of the papers. In a test of the techniques they failed to retrieve two answer‐providing documents (7% of those to be retrieved) because of one multi‐paragraph answer‐passage and one complete failure of clue word selection. For the other answer‐providing documents they retrieved at all recall levels with greater precision than SMART, which has produced the best previously reported recall‐precision results. The retrieval questions (mostly from real users) and documents used in this study were from the field of information science. The results of the study are surprisingly good for retrieval in such a “soft science,” and it is reasonable to hope that in less “soft” sciences and technologies the techniques described will work even better. On this basis a dissemination and retrieval system of the near future is predicted.
Suggested Citation
John O'Connor, 1973.
"Text searching retrieval of answer‐sentences and other answer‐passages,"
Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 24(6), pages 445-460, November.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:jamest:v:24:y:1973:i:6:p:445-460
DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630240606
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:24:y:1973:i:6:p:445-460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.