IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v23y1972i2p75-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new comparison between conventional indexing (MEDLARS) and automatic text processing (SMART)

Author

Listed:
  • G. Salton

Abstract

A new testing process is described designed to compare conventional retrieval (MEDLARS) and automatic text analysis methods (SMART). The results obtained with a collection of documents chosen independently of either SMART or MEDLARS indicate that a simple automatic extraction of keywords from document abstracts produces a 30 to 40 percent loss compared with MEDLARS indexing. A replacement of the unranked Boolean searches used in MEDLARS by the standard ranked output normally provided by SMART reduces the loss to between 15 and 20 percent. When an automatically generated word control list or a thesaurus is used as part of the SMART analysis, the results are comparable in effectiveness to those obtained by the intellectual MEDLARS indexing. Finally, the incorporation of user feedback procedures into SMART furnishes an improvement over the normal MEDLARS output of 15 to 30 percent. One concludes again that no technical justification exists for maintaining controlled, manual indexing in operational retrieval environments.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Salton, 1972. "A new comparison between conventional indexing (MEDLARS) and automatic text processing (SMART)," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 23(2), pages 75-84, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:23:y:1972:i:2:p:75-84
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630230202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630230202
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.4630230202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehrzad Azmi Shabestari & Kevin Moffitt & Bharat Sarath, 2020. "Did the banking sector foresee the financial crisis? Evidence from risk factor disclosures," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 647-669, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:23:y:1972:i:2:p:75-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.