IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jacrfn/v17y2005i1p88-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Framework for Corporate Treasury Performance Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Kalotay

Abstract

Corporations generally do not have a formal process for evaluating the effectiveness of their treasury departments in managing debt. To the extent that corporate borrowing decisions are predicated on “market timing” rather than matching the interest rate sensitivity of the firm's liabilities to that of its assets, the firm is effectively making bets on interest rates that should be monitored and evaluated. The author has developed an approach that allows for periodic reporting of treasury's performance to investors and that also provides a framework for treasury to compare and choose among alternatives in the capital markets. The basic idea is to calculate a company's liability return and then establish a benchmark portfolio that allows measurement of relative performance. For a nonfinancial corporation, a useful benchmark can be constructed using the collective debt obligations of the company's industry peers. The assumption underlying this benchmark is that the financing of the industry as a whole is designed to produce an “optimal” asset‐liability configuration and net exposure to interest rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Kalotay, 2005. "A Framework for Corporate Treasury Performance Measurement," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 17(1), pages 88-93, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:17:y:2005:i:1:p:88-93
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2005.018_1.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2005.018_1.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2005.018_1.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:17:y:2005:i:1:p:88-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1078-1196 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.