IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/istatr/v87y2019i3p580-603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliable Inference in Categorical Regression Analysis for Non‐randomly Coarsened Observations

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Plass
  • Marco E.G.V. Cattaneo
  • Thomas Augustin
  • Georg Schollmeyer
  • Christian Heumann

Abstract

In most surveys, one is confronted with missing or, more generally, coarse data. Traditional methods dealing with these data require strong, untestable and often doubtful assumptions, for example, coarsening at random. But due to the resulting, potentially severe bias, there is a growing interest in approaches that only include tenable knowledge about the coarsening process, leading to imprecise but reliable results. In this spirit, we study regression analysis with a coarse categorical‐dependent variable and precisely observed categorical covariates. Our (profile) likelihood‐based approach can incorporate weak knowledge about the coarsening process and thus offers a synthesis of traditional methods and cautious strategies refraining from any coarsening assumptions. This also allows a discussion of the uncertainty about the coarsening process, besides sampling uncertainty and model uncertainty. Our procedure is illustrated with data of the panel study ‘Labour market and social security' conducted by the Institute for Employment Research, whose questionnaire design produces coarse data.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Plass & Marco E.G.V. Cattaneo & Thomas Augustin & Georg Schollmeyer & Christian Heumann, 2019. "Reliable Inference in Categorical Regression Analysis for Non‐randomly Coarsened Observations," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 87(3), pages 580-603, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:87:y:2019:i:3:p:580-603
    DOI: 10.1111/insr.12329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12329
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/insr.12329?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:87:y:2019:i:3:p:580-603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isiiinl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.