IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/istatr/v85y2017i2p270-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of two Robust Estimation Methods for Business Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Graham Clark
  • Philip Kokic
  • Paul A. Smith

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Graham Clark & Philip Kokic & Paul A. Smith, 2017. "A Comparison of two Robust Estimation Methods for Business Surveys," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 85(2), pages 270-289, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:85:y:2017:i:2:p:270-289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/insr.12177
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mulry Mary H. & Oliver Broderick E. & Kaputa Stephen J., 2014. "Detecting and Treating Verified Influential Values in a Monthly Retail Trade Survey," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 30(4), pages 721-747, December.
    2. Ray Chambers & Adão Hentges & Xinqiang Zhao, 2004. "Robust automatic methods for outlier and error detection," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 167(2), pages 323-339, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian Darko & Giovanni Occhiali & Enrico Vanino, 2021. "The Chinese are Here: Import Penetration and Firm Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(12), pages 2112-2135, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sullivan, Joe H. & Warkentin, Merrill & Wallace, Linda, 2021. "So many ways for assessing outliers: What really works and does it matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 530-543.
    2. Mulry Mary H. & Kaputa Stephen & Thompson Katherine J., 2018. "Setting M-Estimation Parameters for Detection and Treatment of Influential Values," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 34(2), pages 483-501, June.
    3. Helene Boistard & Guillaume Chauvet & David Haziza, 2016. "Doubly Robust Inference for the Distribution Function in the Presence of Missing Survey Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(3), pages 683-699, September.
    4. Chauvet, Guillaume & Do Paco, Wilfried, 2018. "Exact balanced random imputation for sample survey data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-16.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:85:y:2017:i:2:p:270-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isiiinl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.