IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/istatr/v75y2007i3p365-371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical Thinking in Computer‐Based Learning Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Gilberte Schuyten
  • Olivier Thas

Abstract

The theme of technology is particularly important for statistics education because of the role of technology in changing views of statistical knowledge, pedagogy and learning. The interactive multimedia technology of today allows for the creation of powerful learning environments where the focus is on the process that produced the data and its associated variation and the statistical thinking required to solve the problem. However, despite this optimistic view, students' self‐regulation and intrinsic motivation seem to be key concepts for learning in complex interactive computer‐based learning environments. We conclude with observations of teachers and students working with applets. More of these evaluations should be published and/or made available to the statistical community so that both positive and negative teaching experiences can be shared. Le thème de la technologie est particulièrement important pour l'enseignement des statistiques parce que la technologie a changé notre vision du contenu, de la pédagogie et de l'apprentissage des statistiques. Les technologies interactives multimédia d‘aujourd’hui nous offrent la possibilité de créer des environnements d‘apprentissages très puissant où l'on peut se concentrer sur le processus de génération des données, la variation associée et le raisonnement statistique nécessaire pour résoudre le problème. Mais, en dépit de cette vision optimiste, l'autorégulation et la motivation intrinsèque des étudiants sont des concepts clés pour un enseignement dans des environnements d'apprentissages assisté par ordinateur. Cette contribution se conclut avec quelques observations de professeurs et étudiants travaillant avec des applets. La communauté statistique a besoin de telles évaluations approfondies rapportant des expériences positives ainsi que négatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Gilberte Schuyten & Olivier Thas, 2007. "Statistical Thinking in Computer‐Based Learning Environments," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 75(3), pages 365-371, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:75:y:2007:i:3:p:365-371
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2007.00031.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2007.00031.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2007.00031.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald D. Snee, 1999. "Discussion: Development and Use of Statistical Thinking: A New Era," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 67(3), pages 255-258, December.
    2. David S. Moore, 1997. "New Pedagogy and New Content: The Case of Statistics," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 65(2), pages 123-137, August.
    3. Paul L. Darius & Kenneth M. Portier & Eddie Schrevens, 2007. "Virtual Experiments and Their Use in Teaching Experimental Design," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 75(3), pages 281-294, December.
    4. Deborah Nolan & Duncan Temple Lang, 2007. "Dynamic, Interactive Documents for Teaching Statistical Practice," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 75(3), pages 295-321, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Gould, 2010. "Statistics and the Modern Student," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 78(2), pages 297-315, August.
    2. George W. Cobb, 2007. "One Possible Frame for Thinking about Experiential Learning," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 75(3), pages 336-347, December.
    3. Chris Wild, 2007. "Virtual Environments and the Acceleration of Experiential Learning," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 75(3), pages 322-335, December.
    4. Carl J. Schwarz, 2007. "Computer‐Aided Statistical Instruction—Multi‐Mediocre Techno‐Trash?," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 75(3), pages 348-354, December.
    5. Claudia Vásquez & Ángel Alsina, 2021. "Analysing Probability Teaching Practices in Primary Education: What Tasks Do Teachers Implement?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Deborah Nolan & Duncan Temple Lang, 2007. "Dynamic, Interactive Documents for Teaching Statistical Practice," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 75(3), pages 295-321, December.
    7. Yunkee Ahn & Buhn Nam & Chul Eung Kim, 2003. "The Future Direction of Statistical Training for the Promotion of Cooperation between Government and Academy," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 71(2), pages 461-467, August.
    8. Berislav Zmuk, 2015. "Business Sample Survey Measurement on Statistical Thinking and Methods Adoption: The Case of Croatian Small Enterprises," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 13(1), pages 154-166.
    9. Adam R. Cocco & Matthew Katz & Marion E. Hambrick, 2021. "Co-Attendance Communities: A Multilevel Egocentric Network Analysis of American Soccer Supporters’ Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Maria Jureckova & Lucia Csachova, 2020. "Statistical literacy of Slovak lower secondary school students," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 9(1), pages 163-173, July.
    11. Scotland Leman & Leanna House & Andrew Hoegh, 2015. "Developing a New Interdisciplinary Computational Analytics Undergraduate Program: A Qualitative-Quantitative-Qualitative Approach," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(4), pages 397-408, November.
    12. Paula Carroll & Arthur White, 2017. "Identifying Patterns of Learner Behaviour: What Business Statistics Students Do with Learning Resources," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 1-13, September.
    13. Heejoo Suh & Sohyung Kim & Seonyoung Hwang & Sunyoung Han, 2020. "Enhancing Preservice Teachers’ Key Competencies for Promoting Sustainability in a University Statistics Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    14. Wolfgang Härdle & Sigbert Klinke & Uwe Ziegenhagen, 2007. "On the Utility of E‐Learning in Statistics," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 75(3), pages 355-364, December.
    15. Tommy Soesmanto & Suzanne Bonner, 2018. "Dual mode delivery in introductory statistics: Design and evaluation," Discussion Papers in Economics economics:201801, Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
    16. Peter K. Dunn & Michael D. Carey & Michael B. Farrar & Alice M. Richardson & Christine McDonald, 2017. "Introductory Statistics Textbooks and the GAISE Recommendations," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(4), pages 326-335, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:75:y:2007:i:3:p:365-371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isiiinl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.