IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/irvfin/v25y2025i1ne70011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The efficiency of corporate R&D investments: Information‐sharing and government subsidies

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaohua Li
  • Takeshi Yamada

Abstract

We compare the impact of broad‐based equity incentives and government R&D subsidies on the efficiency of corporate innovation. Chinese corporations that offer broad‐based incentives for employees and managers demonstrate greater R&D investment efficiency, as evidenced by a higher ratio of innovation outputs to cost allocation. Conversely, firms receiving government R&D subsidies demonstrate lower efficiency. Accounting for endogenous treatments in a multi‐treatment framework, we suggest an information‐sharing environment is critical for efficient capital allocation. Government agencies will likely provide subsidies based on information different from what firm headquarters might have, while broad‐based incentive programs encourage employee coordination, enhancing efficiency and project quality. To signal project quality, firms with broad‐based incentives capitalize a higher proportion of R&D costs than subsidized firms. We also find that combining broad‐based incentives and subsidies might not create synergies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaohua Li & Takeshi Yamada, 2025. "The efficiency of corporate R&D investments: Information‐sharing and government subsidies," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 25(1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:irvfin:v:25:y:2025:i:1:n:e70011
    DOI: 10.1111/irfi.70011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.70011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irfi.70011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:irvfin:v:25:y:2025:i:1:n:e70011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1369-412X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.