IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v9y2005i4p43-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eco‐efficiency and Its xsTerminology

Author

Listed:
  • Gjalt Huppes
  • Masanobu Ishikawa

Abstract

Eco‐efficiency has been defined as a general goal of creating value while decreasing environmental impact. Leaving out the normative part of this concept, the empirical part refers to a ratio between environmental impact and economic cost or value. Two basic choices must be made in defining practical eco‐efficiency: which variable is in the denominator and which is in the numerator; and whether to specify environmental impact or improvement and value created or cost. Distinguishing between two situations, the general one of value creation and the specific one of environmental improvement efforts, and leaving the numerator‐denominator choice to the user, as diverging practices have developed, four basic types of ecoefficiency result: environmental intensity and environmental productivity in the realm of value creation; and environmental improvement cost and environmental cost‐effectiveness in the realm of environmental improvement measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Gjalt Huppes & Masanobu Ishikawa, 2005. "Eco‐efficiency and Its xsTerminology," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 9(4), pages 43-46, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:9:y:2005:i:4:p:43-46
    DOI: 10.1162/108819805775247891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/108819805775247891
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/108819805775247891?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tuni, Andrea & Rentizelas, Athanasios, 2019. "An innovative eco-intensity based method for assessing extended supply chain environmental sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 126-142.
    2. Djula Borozan, 2023. "Institutions and Environmentally Adjusted Efficiency," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4489-4510, December.
    3. Tothmihaly, Andras & Ingram, Verina & von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan, 2019. "How Can the Environmental Efficiency of Indonesian Cocoa Farms Be Increased?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 134-145.
    4. Figge, Frank & Thorpe, Andrea Stevenson, 2023. "Circular economy, operational eco-efficiency, and sufficiency. An integrated view," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PB).
    5. Witold-Roger Poganietz & Jasmin Friedrich & Helmut Lehn, 2021. "Eco-efficiency of system alternatives of the urban water-energy-waste nexus [Die Ökoeffizienz von Systemalternativen im Wasser-Energie-Abfall Nexus]," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 119-131, June.
    6. Carvalho, Helena & Govindan, Kannan & Azevedo, Susana G. & Cruz-Machado, Virgílio, 2017. "Modelling green and lean supply chains: An eco-efficiency perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 75-87.
    7. Krikke, H.R. & Zuidwijk, R., 2008. "Disposition Choices Based on Energy Footprints instead of Recovery Quota," Other publications TiSEM e8654e2a-9cf2-4d88-aa83-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Pedro L. Cruz & Diego Iribarren & Javier Dufour, 2019. "Life Cycle Costing and Eco-Efficiency Assessment of Fuel Production by Coprocessing Biomass in Crude Oil Refineries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Bei He & Xiaoyun Du & Junkang Li & Dan Chen, 2023. "A Effectiveness-and Efficiency-Based Improved Approach for Measuring Ecological Well-Being Performance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-29, January.
    10. Tsaples, G. & Papathanasiou, J., 2021. "Data envelopment analysis and the concept of sustainability: A review and analysis of the literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    11. J. Van Meensel & A. Kanora & L. Lauwers & J. Jourquin & L. Goossens & G. Van Huylenbroeck, 2010. "From research to farm: ex ante evaluation of strategic deworming in pig finishing," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(10), pages 483-493.
    12. Raquel Lopes Oliveira & Liliane Dolores Fagundes & Renato da Silva Lima & Marcelo Montaño, 2020. "Discrete event simulation to aid decision-making and mitigation in solid waste management," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 67-85, January.
    13. Meylan, Grégoire & Ami, Helen & Spoerri, Andy, 2014. "Transitions of municipal solid waste management. Part II: Hybrid life cycle assessment of Swiss glass-packaging disposal," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 16-27.
    14. Zhongfei Chen & Stavros Kourtzidis & Panayiotis Tzeremes & Nickolaos Tzeremes, 2022. "A robust network DEA model for sustainability assessment: an application to Chinese Provinces," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 235-262, March.
    15. Roberta Arbolino & Luisa De Simone, 2019. "Rethinking public and private policies in Europe with the support of a industrial sustainability index," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 315-339, June.
    16. Quintano, Claudio & Mazzocchi, Paolo & Rocca, Antonella, 2021. "Evaluation of the eco-efficiency of territorial districts with seaport economic activities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    17. Viktoria Mannheim & Weronika Kruszelnicka, 2022. "Energy-Model and Life Cycle-Model for Grinding Processes of Limestone Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    18. Weronika Kruszelnicka, 2020. "A New Model for Environmental Assessment of the Comminution Process in the Chain of Biomass Energy Processing †," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:9:y:2005:i:4:p:43-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.