IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v9y2005i4p105-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Environmental and Economic Assessment of Products and Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Ina Rüdenauer
  • Carl‐Otto Gensch
  • Rainer Grießhammer
  • Dirk Bunke

Abstract

The eco‐efficiency analysis method developed and used by the Öko‐Institut analyzes different alternatives that fulfill a defined consumer need, from an environmental as well as an economic perspective. Like life‐cycle assessment (LCA), eco‐efficiency analysis makes possible the setting of priorities in purchasing decisions or can be used to show optimization potentials in product development processes. Eco‐efficiency analysis builds upon two methods: LCA, according to ISO 14040 ff. (to assess the environmental aspects of products and processes), and life‐cycle costing. Life‐cycle costing results in a single figure—the total costs of ownership to one or several actors. The environmental impacts can be evaluated and aggregated as a single score or the impact category indicator results can be kept separate. In either case two single scores can be compared: the total environmental burden or the impact category indicator results, and the total costs of ownership of the alternatives under consideration. The results can then be plotted in two‐dimensional graphs that show the effectiveness of certain measures in environmental and economic terms. The efficiency is expressed as a numerical ratio of environmental savings to difference in costs. Together with furnishing more detailed results and a discussion of additional benefits or potential barriers, eco‐efficiency analysis broadens the basis for decision‐making processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ina Rüdenauer & Carl‐Otto Gensch & Rainer Grießhammer & Dirk Bunke, 2005. "Integrated Environmental and Economic Assessment of Products and Processes," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 9(4), pages 105-116, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:9:y:2005:i:4:p:105-116
    DOI: 10.1162/108819805775248061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/108819805775248061
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/108819805775248061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kytzia, Susanne & Walz, Ariane & Wegmann, Mattia, 2011. "How can tourism use land more efficiently? A model-based approach to land-use efficiency for tourist destinations," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 629-640.
    2. Mura, Rita & Vicentini, Francesca & Botti, Ludovico Maria & Chiriacò, Maria Vincenza, 2023. "Economic and environmental outcomes of a sustainable and circular approach: Case study of an Italian wine-producing firm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Marileena Koskela & Jarmo Vehmas, 2012. "Defining Eco‐efficiency: A Case Study on the Finnish Forest Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(8), pages 546-566, December.
    4. Rita Mura & Francesca Vicentini & Ludovico Maria Botti & Maria Vincenza Chiriacò, 2024. "Achieving the circular economy through environmental policies: Packaging strategies for more sustainable business models in the wine industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1497-1514, February.
    5. Baharam Roy & Peter Kleine-Möllhoff & Antoine Dalibard, 2022. "Superheated Steam Torrefaction of Biomass Residues with Valorisation of Platform Chemicals Part—2: Economic Assessment and Commercialisation Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Peng, Hongsong & Zhang, Jinhe & Lu, Lin & Tang, Guorong & Yan, Bingjin & Xiao, Xiao & Han, Ya, 2017. "Eco-efficiency and its determinants at a tourism destination: A case study of Huangshan National Park, China," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 201-211.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:9:y:2005:i:4:p:105-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.