IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v6y2002i2p13-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Technology and U.S. Energy Consumption: Energy Hog, Productivity Tool, or Both?

Author

Listed:
  • John A. “Skip” Laitner

Abstract

A significant debate has emerged with respect to the energy requirements of the Internet. The popular literature has echoed a misleading study that incorrectly suggests the growth of the information economy will require huge amounts of new energy resources. Even correcting the misleading assumptions in that study, discussion on this topic tends to result in a highly limited and unsatisfactory review of many larger issues. Although the evidence suggests a relatively small amount of energy is required to power today's information needs—;about 3% of total electricity consumption in the United States—;the complexity and connectivity of the Internet, and, more generally, the information economy, yield a deep uncertainty about the eventual long‐term impact on energy consumption. Although we may not yet be able to generalize about the future long‐term energy needs associated with the information economy, the evidence points to continuing technical changes and the growing substitution of knowledge for material resources. These interrelated trends will likely generate small decreases in energy intensity and reduce subsequent environmental impacts relative to many baseline projections. Despite these trends, a number of questions need to be addressed before any solid long‐term conclusions might be forthcoming. The article reviews some of the dimensions of these possible changes and suggests further directions for research that may help answer these important questions.

Suggested Citation

  • John A. “Skip” Laitner, 2002. "Information Technology and U.S. Energy Consumption: Energy Hog, Productivity Tool, or Both?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 6(2), pages 13-24, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:6:y:2002:i:2:p:13-24
    DOI: 10.1162/108819802763471753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/108819802763471753
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/108819802763471753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:6:y:2002:i:2:p:13-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.