IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v28y2024i6p1730-1742.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From schools of thought to an ecology of practices: Categorizing circular economy's futures

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan Nolan
  • Esmaeil Khedmati Morasae
  • Mike Michael

Abstract

In response to pressing societal challenges, scholars are increasingly focusing on research aimed at fostering sustainable futures. We contribute to that discussion by theorizing the circular economy (CE) as an “ecology of practices.” The ecology of practices concept helps to make sense of a developing field that has been heavily practitioner‐driven. Through an analysis of the diverse CE practices in analytical and operational contexts, we investigate the roles, disciplinary influences, and visions for the future and categorize their trajectories. Drawing on the sociology of expectations, we consider the articulations of CE in practice, advocating for inclusive dialogue among stakeholders and collective engagement with ontological multiplicity in shaping CE futures. We propose a framework that contributes to broader debates in organization and management studies, emphasizing the significance of everyday practices in shaping sustainable futures beyond the realm of CE. In so doing, we focus on unpicking how sustainable futures are variously enacted as a way of enabling collaboration that might otherwise be hindered by disciplinary obligations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan Nolan & Esmaeil Khedmati Morasae & Mike Michael, 2024. "From schools of thought to an ecology of practices: Categorizing circular economy's futures," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(6), pages 1730-1742, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:6:p:1730-1742
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13564
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13564?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:6:p:1730-1742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.