IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v28y2024i3p426-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Between the lines: Life cycle impact assessment models of collision and electrocution impacts of power lines on bird diversity in Norway

Author

Listed:
  • Dafna Gilad
  • Roel May
  • Bård G. Stokke
  • Francesca Verones

Abstract

The expansion of the electric grid is inevitable. Renewable energy is on the rise, and new transmission lines must be built to link new electricity production facilities with the local network. In addition, higher electricity demand due to electrification will lead to the growth of the distribution grid. However, further construction of power lines will affect the local biodiversity. Birds are especially vulnerable: every year, power lines cause the deaths of hundreds of millions of birds by collision and electrocution. Yet the environmental impacts of the electric grid in life cycle assessment (LCA) are limited to a few impact categories, failing to cover the area of protection for damages to ecosystem quality. We developed the first methodology to quantify power lines' collision and electrocution impacts on bird richness within LCA. We calculated the potentially disappeared fraction of species (PDF) by developing species–area relationships using high‐resolution species distribution maps, species‐specific characteristics, and the location of power lines and pylons. We applied our models to Norway, a country that aims to become a low‐emission nation by 2050. The characterization factors ranged between 8.48 × 10−16 and 5.6 × 10−15 PDF*yr/kWh for collision and 3.27 × 10−18 and 1.66 × 10−16 PDF*yr/kWh for electrocution. Integrating power lines’ impacts on biodiversity in LCA is essential, as harmonized models can estimate the effects of electricity production alongside the impacts of electricity distribution. This brings us a step further in promoting a holistic assessment of energy systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Dafna Gilad & Roel May & Bård G. Stokke & Francesca Verones, 2024. "Between the lines: Life cycle impact assessment models of collision and electrocution impacts of power lines on bird diversity in Norway," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 426-438, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:3:p:426-438
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13488
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13488?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Storch & Petr Keil & Walter Jetz, 2012. "Universal species–area and endemics–area relationships at continental scales," Nature, Nature, vol. 488(7409), pages 78-81, August.
    2. Scott R Loss & Tom Will & Peter P Marra, 2014. "Refining Estimates of Bird Collision and Electrocution Mortality at Power Lines in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-10, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Augeraud-Véron, Emmanuelle & Fabbri, Giorgio & Schubert, Katheline, 2021. "Volatility-reducing biodiversity conservation under strategic interactions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    2. Ezra Hadad & Piotr Zduniak & Reuven Yosef, 2022. "Sustaining Increasing Wintering Raptor Populations in Central Israel: A 38 Years Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Péron, Guillaume, 2018. "Process-based vs. ad-hoc methods to estimate mortality using carcass surveys data: A review and a note about evidence complacency," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 111-118.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:3:p:426-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.