IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v24y2020i1p116-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life cycle assessment of 3D printing geo‐polymer concrete: An ex‐ante study

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Yao
  • Mingming Hu
  • Francesco Di Maio
  • Stefano Cucurachi

Abstract

Three‐dimensional (3D) printing and geo‐polymers are two environmentally oriented innovations in concrete manufacturing. The 3D printing of concrete components aims to reduce raw material consumption and waste generation. Geo‐polymer is being developed to replace ordinary Portland cement and reduce the carbon footprint of the binder in the concrete. The environmental performance of the combined use of the two innovations is evaluated through an ex‐ante life cycle assessment (LCA). First, an attributional LCA was implemented, using data collected from the manufacturer to identify the hotspots for environmental improvements. Then, scaled‐up scenarios were built in collaboration with the company stakeholder. These scenarios were compared with the existing production system to understand the potential advantages/disadvantages of the innovative system and to identify the potential directions for improvement. The results indicate that 3D printing can potentially lead to waste reduction. However, depending on its recipe, geo‐polymer likely has higher environmental impacts than ordinary concrete. The ex‐ante LCA suggests that after step‐by‐step improvements in the production and transportation of raw materials, 3D printing geo‐polymer concrete is able to reduce the carbon footprint of concrete components, while it does still perform worse on impact categories, such as depletion of abiotic resources and stratospheric ozone depletion. We found that the most effective way to lower the environmental impacts of 3D concrete is to reduce silicate in the recipe of the geo‐polymer. This approach is, however, challenging to realize by the company due to the locked‐in effect of the previous innovation investment. The case study shows that to support technological innovation ex‐ante LCA has to be implemented as early as possible in innovation to allow for maintaining technical flexibility and improving on the identified hotspots.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Yao & Mingming Hu & Francesco Di Maio & Stefano Cucurachi, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of 3D printing geo‐polymer concrete: An ex‐ante study," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(1), pages 116-127, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:24:y:2020:i:1:p:116-127
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12930
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.12930?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weixin Tang & Gloria Pignatta & Samad M. E. Sepasgozar, 2021. "Life-Cycle Assessment of Fly Ash and Cenosphere-Based Geopolymer Material," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Manideep Samudrala & Syed Mujeeb & Bhagyashri A. Lanjewar & Ravijanya Chippagiri & Muralidhar Kamath & Rahul V. Ralegaonkar, 2023. "3D-Printable Concrete for Energy-Efficient Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:24:y:2020:i:1:p:116-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.