IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v1y1997i2p51-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Grand Objectives: A Framework for Prioritized Grouping of Environmental Concerns in Life‐Cycle Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas E. Graedev

Abstract

The goal of life‐cycle assessment (LCA) is to conduct an inventory of the flows of materials and energy attributable to an industrial product and then to calculate the impacts of those flows on the environment, over the entire product life cycle from premanufacture to end of 1ife. A related technique, streamlined life‐cycle assessment (SLCA), attempts to preserve the breadth of perspective in that approach while performing assessments more efficiently. A common failing of both techniques is that recommendations for actions to improve the environmental responsibility of products have rarely been related in an intellectually rigorous fashion to the environmental concerns they purport to ameliorate. In this article l propose that a framework for the way in which these relationships can be established is by a decision‐making process that begins with the “grand objectives,” the common consensus of the vital goals for the maintenance and improvement of life on Earth. The grand objectives lead to the identification of crucial environmental concerns, and those, in turn, to determining societal activities that need to be examined. Actions related to those activities can then be designed to contribute to the achievement of the grand objectives. If and when such a consensus is established, LCAs and SLCAs can be undertaken with confidence that the actions they recommend will serve broad societal goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas E. Graedev, 1997. "The Grand Objectives: A Framework for Prioritized Grouping of Environmental Concerns in Life‐Cycle Assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 1(2), pages 51-64, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:1:y:1997:i:2:p:51-64
    DOI: 10.1162/jiec.1997.1.2.51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1997.1.2.51
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/jiec.1997.1.2.51?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:1:y:1997:i:2:p:51-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.