IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v13y2009i4p592-606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Informing Packaging Design Decisions at Toyota Motor Sales Using Life Cycle Assessment and Costing

Author

Listed:
  • Claire Early
  • Tim Kidman
  • Michelle Menvielle
  • Roland Geyer
  • Ryan McMullan

Abstract

Throughout their life cycle stages—material production, package manufacture, distribution, end‐of‐life management—packaging systems consume natural resources and energy, generate waste, and emit pollutants. Each of these stages also carries a financial cost. Motivated by a desire to decrease environmental burdens while reducing financial costs associated with the packaging of accessory and service parts, Toyota Motor Sales (TMS) partnered with the Donald Bren School of Environmental Science & Management to build a life cycle assessment and costing tool to support packaging design decisions. The resulting Environmental Packaging Impact Calculator (EPIC) provides comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC). It allows packaging designers to identify environmentally and economically preferable packaging systems in daily decision‐making. EPIC's parameterized process flow model allows users to assess many different packaging systems using a single model. Its input/output interface is designed for users without preexisting knowledge of LCA theory or practice and calculates results based on relatively few input data. The main motivation behind this environmental design tool is to provide relevant information to those individuals who are in the best position to reduce life cycle impacts and costs from TMS's packaging and distribution systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire Early & Tim Kidman & Michelle Menvielle & Roland Geyer & Ryan McMullan, 2009. "Informing Packaging Design Decisions at Toyota Motor Sales Using Life Cycle Assessment and Costing," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 13(4), pages 592-606, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:13:y:2009:i:4:p:592-606
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00137.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00137.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00137.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ricardo Marques Sastre & Istefani Carísio de Paula & Marcia Elisa Soares Echeveste, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review on Packaging Sustainability: Contents, Opportunities, and Guidelines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-31, May.
    2. Hassini, Elkafi & Surti, Chirag & Searcy, Cory, 2012. "A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 69-82.
    3. Kata Vöröskői & Péter Földesi & László T. Kóczy & Péter Böröcz, 2020. "Fuzzy Approach for the Decision on Disposable or Returnable Packaging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Silviya Blagoeva (ed.), 2017. "Modern Logistics – Business And Education," Conferences of the Industrial business and logistics department, Publishing house Science and Economics Varna, number 1.
    5. McDonald, Conor M., 2016. "Integrating packaging and supply chain decisions: Selection of economic handling unit quantities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 208-221.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:13:y:2009:i:4:p:592-606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.