IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v11y2007i4p26-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Assessment of Waste‐Solvent Treatment Options

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Capello
  • Stefanie Hellweg
  • Beat Badertscher
  • Hugo Betschart
  • Konrad Hungerbühler

Abstract

The software tool ecosolvent is presented that allows for comparative environmental assessment of treatment technologies for specific, user‐defined, waste‐solvent mixtures. The tool is composed of models for waste‐solvent distillation as well as for thermal treatment in hazardous waste‐solvent incinerators and cement kilns. It was designed with a tiered structure in order to allow for a high flexibility regarding informational needs. The life‐cycle assessment method was used to assess the environmental impact. The applicability of the tool is shown with two case studies from industry. In these case studies, various waste‐solvent treatment technologies are compared for two specific waste‐solvent mixtures. Potential use of the ecosolvent tool for its role in practical decision making in chemicals industries is illustrated by two case studies of waste‐solvent systems. In the ethyl acetate case study, the tool indicates that solvent recovery by distillation is clearly better than incineration of the waste solvent. The results from the methanol case study are less clear‐cut. In the subsequent article (part II), the ecosolvent tool will be used to derive general rules of thumb and specific recommendations for 45 important solvents used in chemical industries. Additionally, a framework will be presented that provides quick and easy decision support regarding environmentally optimized waste‐solvent management.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Capello & Stefanie Hellweg & Beat Badertscher & Hugo Betschart & Konrad Hungerbühler, 2007. "Environmental Assessment of Waste‐Solvent Treatment Options," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(4), pages 26-38, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:11:y:2007:i:4:p:26-38
    DOI: 10.1162/jiec.2007.1231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.2007.1231
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/jiec.2007.1231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:11:y:2007:i:4:p:26-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.