IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v56y2025i1p46-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the 2022–2023 strike wave in Britain: ballots, participation and methodological implications

Author

Listed:
  • Andy Hodder
  • Stephen Mustchin

Abstract

This paper analyses new forms of strike data published as a result of the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act. An unintended consequence of the Act is that we now have quantifiable data at the micro level, which has previously been unavailable, that helps us understand the various mechanisms at play in individual strikes. We analyse two disputes from the 2022‐2023 strike wave in detail (in NHS England and on the UK's rail system), and provide the first academic analysis of these new forms of strike data. The aim of the paper is to examine what these new forms of data can tell us about strikes using examples of two disputes. While the paper is not designed to be an in‐depth study of the strikes themselves, the use of these novel forms of data enable new insights into membership participation in strikes, and builds upon long‐standing analyses of the relative power resources of unions.

Suggested Citation

  • Andy Hodder & Stephen Mustchin, 2025. "Measuring the 2022–2023 strike wave in Britain: ballots, participation and methodological implications," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 46-74, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:56:y:2025:i:1:p:46-74
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.12450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12450
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.12450?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:56:y:2025:i:1:p:46-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.