IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v49y2025i1p39-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

INFORMALITY AS THE UR‐FORM OF URBANITY: Keeping the Ur‐ in Urban Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Dovey

Abstract

After 50 years of research on urban informality, why is it that we seem unable to either clearly define this concept or move beyond it? On the one hand, urban informality is identified with ‘slums’ and substandard outcomes, on the other, with deregulated markets and neoliberal urbanism. Yet it is also identified as a self‐organized urbanism that adds vitality, affordability, diversity, creativity and adaptability to the city—a form of urbanity that embodies the ‘right to the city’ and urban commoning. How are we to understand this paradox and move beyond the informal/formal as a binary distinction? If informality is more than a lack of formality, then what is informality‐in‐itself? The key argument here is that urban informality is the original form of urbanity—the ur‐form—while formal urbanism is its necessary counterpart. Informal urbanism is not a lack of formality, but the ground from which the formal emerges. This inversion changes the way we understand the city as an in/formal assemblage. While rampant informality may seem the very antithesis of urban planning, to erase it is to kill urbanity itself. The challenge is to engage this paradox—planning for the unplanned, keeping the ur‐ in urban studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Dovey, 2025. "INFORMALITY AS THE UR‐FORM OF URBANITY: Keeping the Ur‐ in Urban Studies," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 39-51, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:49:y:2025:i:1:p:39-51
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.13284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13284
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.13284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:49:y:2025:i:1:p:39-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.